Papini faces a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison and up to $500,000 in fines. Papini is currently staying with a relative in Chico, California, roughly 75 miles south of where Keith and the children live, court documents show. Sherri Papini’s attorney declined to comment on the filing. We, both children and I, need time to recover and stabilize.”Īccording to the divorce petition, the Papinis have been married since October 2009 and separated on March 3, the same day she was arrested on federal charges. “The fact that their mother lied to them on such a major issue is something they, and I, are having a hard time dealing with. His wife had lied to their children about her disappearance, Keith Papini said in a court document. Keith Papini, in his filing, said that his wife was “not acting in a rational manner.” Papini told the court she was in treatment for anxiety, depression, and PTSD for about five years starting in 2016 and struggled a bit during middle school. Sherri Papini: Husband of woman who faked 2016 kidnapping, files for divorce and child custody - CNN A year after California mom’s mysterious disappearance, new info surfaces | Sherri Papini: California Mom Had Male DNA on Her BACKSTORY: Redding Crime 2.0 Missing Person Sherri Papini If everyone uses common sense and does not reduce this discussion to name calling and all kinds of other immature acts, we shouldn't have a problem.īasing your opinion/posts on the facts in this case and doing so in a mature manner will mean the Papini thread will stay open. Meaning mainstream media and police sources. *You cannot use rumor and innuendo to explain your theory as to why Papini made up the kidnapping story. A side note if you want I would love to read your theories on why the police are so adamant she is telling the truth *You can discuss, like a mature person who is expressing their opinion in front of the whole Papini family, why you believe Sherri Papini is not telling the truth. Example: Fox News Story Sherri Papini case: DNA evidence triggers new questions over 'super mom' kidnapping claim *You can discuss the discrepancies reported by the mainstream media. *You can discuss the discrepancies in Sherri's statements, her husband's, or anyone else who has given a statement to the police. With that in mind here is what is now open for discussion. Whatever you choose to say (within TOS of course) you can do so in a kind and mature manner. Keep that vision in your mind while you type your post. Let me just throw this out there what if everyone is wrong? Can you imagine the pain?īefore I tell you the rules for discussion Sherri's case, I want to envision you are sitting with Sherri, her husband, and her CHILDREN, while you are telling them your theory. Not that this played any part in my decision on what to allow in the Papini discussion I can tell you I can't find anyone who believes her other than a handful of posters on Websleuths. We have the police saying they believe Sherri is telling the truth yet there are discrepancies.
In the Papini case, discussion forum and victim friendly forum smash head-on into each other.įirst and foremost we are a discussion forum.īecause there are many mainstream media articles about the discrepancies in Sherri's story, we must allow a discussion to contain opinions that Sherri is not truthful, and the next logical leap is we must allow the theory that Sherri is not telling the truth about her kidnapping.
Rarely do these two descriptions collide. A very close second is we are a victim friendly forum. More about Cameron Gamble of hostage negotiation and reverse ransom “fame.First and foremost Websleuths is a true crime discussion forum. More about Cameron Gamble of hostage negotiation and reverse ransom “fame.” The Shady Hostage Negotiator at the Center of Sherri Papini’s Abduction (Bertain was given multiple opportunities to rebut or challenge this version of events but offered no comment.) Still, the lead investigator, Lt Anthony Bertain, told Papini’s friends and family that he did not think she had been abducted – despite ample testimony that she was a loving wife and a “supermom” completely devoted to her young kids.
Kidnapping, reverse ransom and a bounty: the strange case of Sherri Papini The California department of justice initially listed her as a “ voluntary missing adult” before changing its classification – in response to a public outcry – to disappearance under suspicious circumstances. He “went ballistic” over the reverse ransom idea. It’s so interesting to read an article written when everyone still believed SP, except the lead investigator. The reverse ransom was such a bizarre part of this case, I’m surprised and disappointed the show doesn’t cover it.
0 kommentar(er)
